The NBA Finals are About Possession: How Turnovers Are Quietly Deciding OKC vs. Indiana
In a Finals featuring rising superstars, unpredictable swings, and potential new dynasties, the stat that matters most isn't points, shooting splits, or even defensive rating.
It's turnovers.
The national spotlight has focused on Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Tyrese Haliburton, but the real battle is happening in the margins — and the turnover column is quietly becoming the most accurate predictor of victory. Through six games, the trend is clear: the team that protects the ball better wins.
The Numbers That Tell the Story
Let's start with the raw data. Below is a game-by-game breakdown of turnover differential (OKC turnovers minus Indiana turnovers) and how that aligned with OKC's performance:
Data table showcasing correlation between OKC’s win margin and turnover differential in six games.
Key Takeaways:
When OKC had fewer turnovers than Indiana (Games 1, 2, 4, 5), they went 3–1, winning by an average margin of 8.25 points.
When OKC had more turnovers (Games 3, 6), they went 0–2, losing by 13.0 points on average.:
Turnover margin has been the clearest predictor of OKC’s performance this series, and this pattern is consistent throughout their entire offseason run.
Visualizing the Impact
To illustrate this pattern more clearly, this is a model of OKC’s turnover differential compared to their win margin:
Each point represents one game in the 2025 NBA Finals. A more negative turnover differential (OKC committing fewer turnovers than Indiana) consistently aligns with OKC wins.
The clear downward trend means when OKC commits more turnovers than Indiana, their win margin dips sharply. Statistically, there’s a moderate inverse correlation (–0.54) between OKC’s turnover margin and point differential — the worse they are at protecting the ball, the more likely they are to lose.
Game 6 (on the bottom left) was the pattern in full bloom.
OKC turned over the ball 21 times, resulting in 32 points for Indiana — over a quarter of the Pacers' total offense.
These weren't isolated mistakes. They were live-ball giveaways, fueling fast breaks and early threes. Built to scramble and switch, OKC's defense was left in retreat. Haliburton didn't dominate one-on-one. Indiana didn't out-talent OKC. They out-possessed them.
OKC’s TURNOVER Identity Crisis
What makes this trend even more impactful is how it cuts against Oklahoma City's DNA.
The Thunder are not built to grind in the half-court. They thrive on speed, length, and chaos — on forcing turnovers, not committing them. When they control possession, their defense gets set and they optimize their elite transition game. Their youth and athleticism wears opponents down.
However, when they become the ones making the mistakes — when they give the Pacers extra chances and let Indiana dictate the pace — it neutralizes the very factors that make OKC dangerous. Even Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, one of the most poised guards in the league, fell victim to this: six mostly unforced turnovers in Game 6, leading to the team's biggest loss (91-108) in the whole series.
The Bigger Picture: This Finals Is about control
NBA fans and media are conditioned to frame playoff outcomes around stars. Who dropped 40? Who had the best game? Who had the "killer instinct"? And sure, individual brilliance will always matter.
However, this Finals—statistically and stylistically proven—is not about superstardom. It's about possession control.
Consider this:
OKC is 15–4 this postseason when they win the turnover battle.
They are 0–3 when they lose it.
Meanwhile, Indiana is only getting sharper and more confident with each game. Haliburton had 10 assists to 1 turnover in Game 6. Secondary playmaker Andrew Nembhard had zero turnovers while scoring in double figures.
Rick Carlisle has drilled this team to punish every mistake—every soft pass or off-balance handle is an opportunity for easy fast-break points. They aren't playing quicker; instead, they're playing cleaner. And right now, that's more dangerous.
If OKC doesn't clean it up in Game 7, they will not have the possessions they need to win.
FINAL THOUGHTS
If Indiana takes Game 7, which they very well could, it won't be because Haliburton drops 35 or Myles Turner hits six threes. It'll be because OKC couldn't hold onto the ball.
In this series, turnovers aren’t just a stat—they’re the story.
That might not be as flashy as a poster dunk or buzzer-beater, but it’s how champions are made in this era of basketball.
All statistical analysis in this article was conducted independently by Christina Kontomichalou using publicly available game data and manual tracking.
📬 This article is part of The Pivot, my weekly NBA strategy and analytics newsletter read by 85,000+ subscribers. If you enjoyed this breakdown, you can subscribe here to get deep-dive insights like this every week.